PAS 8671:2022 ─ PRINCIPAL DESIGNER ─ ICM CRITERIA

Assessing Competences of Principal Designer (PD) Candidates under PAS 8671:2022 Recommendations

Exceptional (10 points): Candidate possesses relevant advanced degree(s) in architecture, engineering, construction, or a related field from a recognized institution.
Proficient (8 points): Candidate holds a bachelor's degree or equivalent in a relevant discipline.
Adequate (6 points): Candidate has completed a diploma or vocational qualification related to the construction and property sector.
Needs Improvement (4 points): Candidate has limited formal education in relevant fields.

Exceptional (20 points): Candidate has over 10 years of experience working in the construction and property sector, with a proven track record of successfully performing as a Principal Designer on various building projects.
Proficient (16 points): Candidate possesses at least 5 to 10 years of experience in the industry, with demonstrated experience as a Principal Designer or in relevant roles.
Adequate (12 points): Candidate has 2 to 5 years of relevant experience in the construction and property sector.
Needs Improvement (8 points): Candidate has limited or no experience in relevant roles.

Exceptional (15 points): Candidate has completed comprehensive and up-to-date training in building safety, risk management, and relevant safety regulations, with evidence of additional certifications.
Proficient (12 points): Candidate has undertaken relevant training in building safety and possesses necessary certifications.
Adequate (9 points): Candidate has basic knowledge of building safety but lacks additional certifications.
Needs Improvement (6 points): Candidate lacks formal training in building safety.

Exceptional (15 points): Candidate demonstrates in-depth understanding of the Building Safety Act, Building Regulations, and other relevant legislation, with evidence of staying updated with the latest changes and amendments.
Proficient (12 points): Candidate shows a good understanding of building regulations and relevant laws.
Adequate (9 points): Candidate possesses basic knowledge of relevant regulations.
Needs Improvement (6 points): Candidate lacks understanding of essential regulations.

Exceptional (20 points): Candidate exhibits exceptional architectural and technical design skills, with a focus on building safety and user needs.
Proficient (16 points): Candidate demonstrates proficient design and technical abilities related to building safety.
Adequate (12 points): Candidate has adequate design and technical knowledge but requires improvement in certain areas.
Needs Improvement (8 points): Candidate lacks essential design and technical competencies.

Exceptional (15 points): Candidate can effectively identify and assess potential hazards during the design phase, with a proven ability to implement robust risk mitigation measures.
Proficient (12 points): Candidate shows adequate risk assessment skills and understanding of risk management.
Adequate (9 points): Candidate possesses basic risk assessment skills but requires improvement.
Needs Improvement (6 points): Candidate lacks essential risk assessment abilities.

Exceptional (10 points): Candidate demonstrates excellent collaboration and communication skills, fostering productive relationships with project teams, clients, and stakeholders.
Proficient (8 points): Candidate exhibits proficient collaboration and communication abilities.
Adequate (6 points): Candidate has adequate communication skills but needs improvement in collaboration.
Needs Improvement (4 points): Candidate's communication and collaboration skills require significant improvement.

Exceptional (10 points): Candidate can effectively manage the design process, ensuring compliance with safety requirements, and has experience in coordinating various project stakeholders.
Proficient (8 points): Candidate exhibits good project management abilities.
Adequate (6 points): Candidate has some project management skills but requires further development.
Needs Improvement (4 points): Candidate lacks essential project management capabilities.

Exceptional (5 points): Candidate demonstrates a strong commitment to ongoing professional development, regularly engaging in relevant training and education.
Proficient (4 points): Candidate participates in CPD activities but may benefit from further engagement.
Adequate (3 points): Candidate has limited involvement in CPD activities.
Needs Improvement (2 points): Candidate lacks a commitment to CPD.

Exceptional (5 points): Candidate receives highly positive references and recommendations from previous clients, employers, or colleagues.
Proficient (4 points): Candidate receives generally positive references and recommendations.
Adequate (3 points): Candidate receives mixed references and recommendations.
Needs Improvement (2 points): Candidate's references and recommendations are not supportive.

Exceptional (5 points): Candidate possesses adequate professional indemnity insurance coverage.
Proficient (4 points): Candidate has insurance coverage but may need to update or expand coverage.
Adequate (3 points): Candidate's insurance coverage is limited or needs improvement.
Needs Improvement (2 points): Candidate lacks proper insurance coverage.